TY - JOUR
T1 - A case study for project and portfolio management information system selection
T2 - a group AHP-scoring model approach
AU - Gerogiannis, Vassilis C.
AU - Fitsilis, Panos
AU - Voulgaridou, Dimitra
AU - Kirytopoulos, Konstantīnos A.
AU - Sachini, Evi
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Features variety, variations among organisations’ needs and the plethora of powerful project and portfolio management (PPM) information systems in the market, make the selection process among various PPM information systems a complicated process. The large number of the evaluation criteria involved during the decision aggravates the problem. This paper addresses the limitation of the number of criteria in such complex decision problems. It develops a hybrid model that exploits the benefits of the group analytic hierarchy process (GAHP) along with the simplicity of the scoring model for justifying the final selection. The proposed approach permits consideration of much more criteria than the typical AHP approach can reasonably handle and takes into account experts’ opinions for the comparison of the PPM information systems as well as users’ opinions on specific preferences/needs. The proposed approach is applied on a real case in a public Greek organisation.
AB - Features variety, variations among organisations’ needs and the plethora of powerful project and portfolio management (PPM) information systems in the market, make the selection process among various PPM information systems a complicated process. The large number of the evaluation criteria involved during the decision aggravates the problem. This paper addresses the limitation of the number of criteria in such complex decision problems. It develops a hybrid model that exploits the benefits of the group analytic hierarchy process (GAHP) along with the simplicity of the scoring model for justifying the final selection. The proposed approach permits consideration of much more criteria than the typical AHP approach can reasonably handle and takes into account experts’ opinions for the comparison of the PPM information systems as well as users’ opinions on specific preferences/needs. The proposed approach is applied on a real case in a public Greek organisation.
KW - AHP
KW - analytic hierarchy process
KW - group decision-making
KW - hybrid model
KW - MCDM
KW - multi-criteria decision-making
KW - project and portfolio management information systems
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80055027106&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1504/IJPOM.2010.035873
DO - 10.1504/IJPOM.2010.035873
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:80055027106
SN - 1740-2891
VL - 2
SP - 361
EP - 381
JO - International Journal of Project Organisation and Management
JF - International Journal of Project Organisation and Management
IS - 4
ER -