Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A cross-cultural study of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment for people with hearing impairment

  • Stacey Theocharous
  • , Greg Savage
  • , Anna Pavlina Charalambous
  • , Mathieu Côté
  • , Renaud David
  • , Kathleen Gallant
  • , Catherine Helmer
  • , Robert Laforce
  • , Iracema Leroi
  • , Ralph N. Martins
  • , Ziad Nasreddine
  • , Antonis Politis
  • , David Reeves
  • , Gregor Russell
  • , Marie Josée Sirois
  • , Hamid R. Sohrabi
  • , Chyrssoula Thodi
  • , Christiane Völter
  • , Wai Kent Yeung
  • , Piers Dawes
  • Macquarie University
  • European University Cyprus
  • CHUL
  • CHU de Nice
  • MoCA Clinic and Institute
  • Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
  • Université Laval
  • Trinity College Dublin
  • Edith Cowan University
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
  • University of Manchester
  • Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust
  • Murdoch University
  • Ruhr University Bochum
  • University of Queensland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Cognitive screening tools enable the detection of cognitive impairment, facilitate timely intervention, inform clinical care, and allow long-term planning. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment for people with hearing impairment (MoCA-H) was developed as a reliable cognitive screening tool for people with hearing loss. Using the same methodology across four languages, this study examined whether cultural or linguistic factors affect the performance of the MoCA-H. Methods: The current study investigated the performance of the MoCA-H across English, German, French, and Greek language groups (n = 385) controlling for demographic factors known to affect the performance of the MoCA-H. Results: In a multiple regression model accounting for age, sex, and education, cultural–linguistic group accounted for 6.89% of variance in the total MoCA-H score. Differences between languages in mean score of up to 2.6 points were observed. Conclusions: Cultural or linguistic factors have a clinically significant impact on the performance of the MoCA-H such that optimal performance cut points for identification of cognitive impairment derived in English-speaking populations are likely inappropriate for use in non-English speaking populations. To ensure reliable identification of cognitive impairment, it is essential that locally appropriate performance cut points are established for each translation of the MoCA-H.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3156-3162
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume72
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • cognitive testing
  • cross-cultural comparison
  • hearing impaired persons
  • mental status and dementia tests
  • transcultural study
  • validity and reliability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A cross-cultural study of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment for people with hearing impairment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this