TY - JOUR
T1 - A newly developed droplet digital PCR for Ehrlichia canis detection
T2 - comparisons to conventional PCR and blood smear techniques
AU - Wichianchot, Sakulchit
AU - Hongsrichan, Nuttanan
AU - Maneeruttanarungroj, Cherdsak
AU - Pinlaor, Somchai
AU - Iamrod, Kantapong
AU - Purisarn, Andaman
AU - Donthaisong, Peerawich
AU - Karanis, Panagiotis
AU - Nimsuphan, Burin
AU - Rucksaken, Rucksak
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis caused by Ehrlichiacanis infection is a life-threatening vector-borne disease in dogs worldwide. Routine blood smear has very low sensitivity and cannot accurately provide a quantitative result. Conventional PCR (cPCR) and real-time PCR (qPCR) are widely used as molecular methods for E. canis detection. qPCR is quantitative but relies on standard curves of known samples. To overcome this difficulty, this study developed a new E. canis quantitative detection method, using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). ddPCR was evaluated against cPCR and blood smears. PCR amplicons and genomic DNA (gDNA) from 12 microscopic positive samples were used to identify the limits of detection (LODs) in ddPCR and cPCR. Our ddPCR was assessed in 92 field samples, it was compared with cPCR and blood smears. ddPCR showed LOD=1.6 copies/reaction, or 78 times more sensitive than cPCR (LOD=126 copies/ reaction), using PCR amplicons as a template, whereas both ddPCR and cPCR had equal LODs at 0.02 ng gDNA/reaction. In addition, ddPCR had 100% sensitivity and 75% specificity for E. canis detection compared to cPCR and no cross-reaction with other blood pathogens was observed. ddPCR identified more positive samples than cPCR and blood smear. ddPCR improved the overall performance of E. canis detection, with a better LOD and comparable sensitivity and specificity to cPCR. The technique might be helpful for diagnosis of E. canis in light infection, evaluating the number of E. canis and follow-up after treatment.
AB - Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis caused by Ehrlichiacanis infection is a life-threatening vector-borne disease in dogs worldwide. Routine blood smear has very low sensitivity and cannot accurately provide a quantitative result. Conventional PCR (cPCR) and real-time PCR (qPCR) are widely used as molecular methods for E. canis detection. qPCR is quantitative but relies on standard curves of known samples. To overcome this difficulty, this study developed a new E. canis quantitative detection method, using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). ddPCR was evaluated against cPCR and blood smears. PCR amplicons and genomic DNA (gDNA) from 12 microscopic positive samples were used to identify the limits of detection (LODs) in ddPCR and cPCR. Our ddPCR was assessed in 92 field samples, it was compared with cPCR and blood smears. ddPCR showed LOD=1.6 copies/reaction, or 78 times more sensitive than cPCR (LOD=126 copies/ reaction), using PCR amplicons as a template, whereas both ddPCR and cPCR had equal LODs at 0.02 ng gDNA/reaction. In addition, ddPCR had 100% sensitivity and 75% specificity for E. canis detection compared to cPCR and no cross-reaction with other blood pathogens was observed. ddPCR identified more positive samples than cPCR and blood smear. ddPCR improved the overall performance of E. canis detection, with a better LOD and comparable sensitivity and specificity to cPCR. The technique might be helpful for diagnosis of E. canis in light infection, evaluating the number of E. canis and follow-up after treatment.
KW - blood smear
KW - conventional polymerase chain reaction
KW - detection
KW - droplet digital polymerase chain reaction
KW - Ehrlichiacanis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85132247183
U2 - 10.1292/jvms.22-0086
DO - 10.1292/jvms.22-0086
M3 - Article
C2 - 35473801
AN - SCOPUS:85132247183
SN - 0916-7250
VL - 84
SP - 831
EP - 840
JO - Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
JF - Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
IS - 6
ER -