Adolescent pornographic internet site use: A multivariate regression analysis of the predictive factors of use and psychosocial implications

  • Artemis Tsitsika
  • , Elena Critselis
  • , Georgios Kormas
  • , Eleftheria Konstantoulaki
  • , Andreas Constantopoulos
  • , Dimitrios Kafetzis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The study objectives were to evaluate the prevalence, predictors, and implications of pornographic Internet site (PIS) use among Greek adolescents. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 529 randomly selected Greek high school students. The prevalence of overall PIS use was 19.47% (n=96). Among PIS users, 55 (57.29%) reported infrequent and 41 (42.71%) reported frequent PIS use. The predictors of infrequent PIS use included male gender (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]= 8.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] =3.52-19.61), Internet use for sexual education (AOR=5.26; 95% CI=1.78-15.55), chat rooms (AOR=2.95; 95% CI=1.48-5.91), and purchases (AOR=3.06; 95% CI=1.22-7.67). The predictors of frequent PIS use were male gender (AOR=19.61; 95% CI=4.46-83.33), Internet use for sexual education (AOR=7.39; 95% CI=2.37-23.00), and less than 10 hours per week Internet use (AOR=1.32; 95% CI=1.10-1.59). Compared to non-PIS users, infrequent PIS users were twice as likely to have abnormal conduct problems (odds ratio [OR] =2.74; 95% CI=1.19-6.28); frequent PIS users were significantly more likely to have abnormal conduct problems (OR=4.05; 95% CI=1.57-10.46) and borderline prosocial score (OR=4.22; 95% CI=1.64-10.85). Thus, both infrequent and frequent PIS use are prevalent and significantly associated with social maladjustment among Greek adolescents.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)545-550
Number of pages6
JournalCyberpsychology and Behavior
Volume12
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adolescent pornographic internet site use: A multivariate regression analysis of the predictive factors of use and psychosocial implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this