Abstract
The biological bases for late-life psychotic disorders are unknown. Thus, diverse clinical phenomenology that is often described by a single nominative may actually represent multiple biological abnormalities. Conversely, several differently named disorders may actually have similar biological substrates. Until there is a greater understanding of the biological underpinnings of such disorders, diagnostic nomenclature should not only be rigorously applied, but consistent across the scientific community. The review of the use of the term "late paraphrenia" by Riecher-Rössler et al. (1995, this issue) underscores the potential confusion of multiple nominatives, and their suggestion to abandon the term "late paraphrenia" in ICD-10 merits serious consideration.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 355-356 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Schizophrenia Bulletin |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1995 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Commentary to "late-onset schizophrenia and late paraphrenia"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver