Comprehension processes and outcomes with refutation and expository texts and their contribution to learning

Irene Anna N. Diakidoy, Thalia Mouskounti, Argyro Fella, Christos Ioannides

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The study compared the comprehension processes and outcomes obtained with refutation and expository text and their association with learning outcomes. After a knowledge pretest, undergraduate students read an extended expository text or a corresponding refutation text that addressed three potential misconceptions about the scientific concept of energy. Think-aloud, cued recall, and posttest data indicated that the positive impact of refutation text was more associated with comprehension outcomes than processes. Refutation text did not influence comprehension processes but facilitated valid inference generation in recall and minimized the negative effects of distortions on learning. The findings suggest the timing of the refutation text effect to be later, after reading, and its nature to be that of neutralizing the influence of any misconceptions on learning from text instead of changing them.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)60-69
Number of pages10
JournalLearning and Instruction
Volume41
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Comprehension
  • Inferencing
  • Learning
  • Refutation text

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comprehension processes and outcomes with refutation and expository texts and their contribution to learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this