Abstract
The study compared the comprehension processes and outcomes obtained with refutation and expository text and their association with learning outcomes. After a knowledge pretest, undergraduate students read an extended expository text or a corresponding refutation text that addressed three potential misconceptions about the scientific concept of energy. Think-aloud, cued recall, and posttest data indicated that the positive impact of refutation text was more associated with comprehension outcomes than processes. Refutation text did not influence comprehension processes but facilitated valid inference generation in recall and minimized the negative effects of distortions on learning. The findings suggest the timing of the refutation text effect to be later, after reading, and its nature to be that of neutralizing the influence of any misconceptions on learning from text instead of changing them.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 60-69 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Learning and Instruction |
Volume | 41 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2016 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Comprehension
- Inferencing
- Learning
- Refutation text