Decision making and planning under low levels of predictability

Spyros Makridakis, Nassim Taleb

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

    Abstract

    This special section aims to demonstrate the limited predictability and high level of uncertainty in practically all important areas of our lives, and the implications of this. It summarizes the huge body of solid empirical evidence accumulated over the past several decades that proves the disastrous consequences of inaccurate forecasts in areas ranging from the economy and business to floods and medicine. The big problem is, however, that the great majority of people, decision and policy makers alike, still believe not only that accurate forecasting is possible, but also that uncertainty can be reliably assessed. Reality, however, shows otherwise, as this special section proves. This paper discusses forecasting accuracy and uncertainty, and distinguishes three distinct types of predictions: those relying on patterns for forecasting, those utilizing relationships as their basis, and those for which human judgment is the major determinant of the forecast. In addition, the major problems and challenges facing forecasters and the reasons why uncertainty cannot be assessed reliably are discussed using four large data sets. There is also a summary of the eleven papers included in this special section, as well as some concluding remarks emphasizing the need to be rational and realistic about our expectations and avoid the common delusions related to forecasting.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)716-733
    Number of pages18
    JournalInternational Journal of Forecasting
    Volume25
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2009

    Keywords

    • Accuracy
    • Forecasting
    • Judgmental predictions
    • Low level predictability
    • Non-normal forecasting errors
    • Uncertainty

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Decision making and planning under low levels of predictability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this