TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in detecting sinonasal pathology using clinical imaging modalities
T2 - a systematic review
AU - Petsiou, Dioni Pinelopi
AU - Spinos, Dimitrios
AU - Martinos, Anastasios
AU - Muzaffar, Jameel
AU - Garas, Georgios
AU - Georgalas, Christos
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025, International Rhinologic Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: Sinonasal pathology can be complex and requires a systematic and meticulous approach. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in sinonasal imaging, but its clinical applicability remains an area of ongoing research. This systematic review evaluates the methodologies and clinical relevance of AI in detecting sinonasal pathology through radiological imaging. Methodology: Key search terms included “artificial intelligence,”“deep learning,”“machine learning,”“neural network,” and “paranasal sinuses,”. Abstract and full-text screening was conducted using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted on study design, AI architectures used (e.g., Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Machine Learning classifiers), and clinical characteristics, such as imaging modality (e.g., Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)). Results: A total of 53 studies were analyzed, with 85% retrospective, 68% single-center, and 92.5% using internal databases. CT was the most common imaging modality (60.4%), and chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyposis (CRSsNP) was the most studied condition (34.0%). Forty-one studies employed neural networks, with classification as the most frequent AI task (35.8%). Key performance metrics included Area Under the Curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score. Quality assessment based on CONSORT-AI yielded a mean score of 16.0 ± 2. Conclusions: AI shows promise in improving sinonasal imaging interpretation. However, as existing research is predominantly retrospective and single-center, further studies are needed to evaluate AI’s generalizability and applicability. More research is also required to explore AI's role in treatment planning and post-treatment prediction for clinical integration.
AB - Background: Sinonasal pathology can be complex and requires a systematic and meticulous approach. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in sinonasal imaging, but its clinical applicability remains an area of ongoing research. This systematic review evaluates the methodologies and clinical relevance of AI in detecting sinonasal pathology through radiological imaging. Methodology: Key search terms included “artificial intelligence,”“deep learning,”“machine learning,”“neural network,” and “paranasal sinuses,”. Abstract and full-text screening was conducted using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted on study design, AI architectures used (e.g., Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Machine Learning classifiers), and clinical characteristics, such as imaging modality (e.g., Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)). Results: A total of 53 studies were analyzed, with 85% retrospective, 68% single-center, and 92.5% using internal databases. CT was the most common imaging modality (60.4%), and chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyposis (CRSsNP) was the most studied condition (34.0%). Forty-one studies employed neural networks, with classification as the most frequent AI task (35.8%). Key performance metrics included Area Under the Curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score. Quality assessment based on CONSORT-AI yielded a mean score of 16.0 ± 2. Conclusions: AI shows promise in improving sinonasal imaging interpretation. However, as existing research is predominantly retrospective and single-center, further studies are needed to evaluate AI’s generalizability and applicability. More research is also required to explore AI's role in treatment planning and post-treatment prediction for clinical integration.
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - diagnosis
KW - medical imaging
KW - Sinonasal pathology
KW - systematic review
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105012759272
U2 - 10.4193/Rhin25.044
DO - 10.4193/Rhin25.044
M3 - Review article
C2 - 40388840
AN - SCOPUS:105012759272
SN - 0300-0729
VL - 63
SP - 448
EP - 462
JO - Rhinology
JF - Rhinology
IS - 4
ER -