Evidence-based surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps

  • Christos Georgalas
  • , Marjolein Cornet
  • , Gwijde Adriaensen
  • , Susanne Reinartz
  • , Carlijn Holland
  • , Emmanuel Prokopakis
  • , Wytske Fokkens

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Meta-analysis of both large outcome studies as well as cohort studies support the safety and efficacy of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis. The efficacy of endoscopic sinus surgery is demonstrated in the improvement of both disease-specific and generic QOL as well as objective measures. However, this must be interpreted together with a well-recognized long-term 15-20 % revision rate, seen more often in patients with ASA trias and cystic fibrosis as well as osteitis and previous surgery. The effect of surgery is higher in managing nasal obstruction (effect size 1.7) and less so hyposmia (effect size 0.8). Allergy has an additive role on the symptomatology of CRS; however, its role if any on the outcome of ESS for CRS is unclear. The concurrent presence of aspiring sensitivity and asthma is associated with increased disease burden and more revision surgeries. Improved phenotyping of CRS may lead in the future to better tailoring of surgical treatments.

Original languageEnglish
Article number427
JournalCurrent Allergy and Asthma Reports
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Allergy
  • Asthma
  • Biofilms
  • Chronic rhinosinusitis
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Endoscopic sinus surgery
  • Immunodeficiency
  • Nasal polyposis
  • Nasal polyps
  • Osteitis
  • Paranasal sinus
  • Patient outcomes assessment
  • Quality of life
  • Revision surgery
  • Smoking
  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence-based surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this