TY - JOUR
T1 - Higher education students' perceptions of ChatGPT
T2 - A global study of early reactions
AU - Ravšelj, Dejan
AU - Keržič, Damijana
AU - Tomaževič, Nina
AU - Umek, Lan
AU - Brezovar, Nejc
AU - Iahad, Noorminshah A.
AU - Abdulla, Ali Abdulla
AU - Akopyan, Anait
AU - Segura, Magdalena Waleska Aldana
AU - AlHumaid, Jehan
AU - Allam, Mohamed Farouk
AU - Alló, Maria
AU - Andoh, Raphael Papa Kweku
AU - Andronic, Octavian
AU - Arthur, Yarhands Dissou
AU - Aydin, Fatih
AU - Badran, Amira
AU - Balbontín-Alvarado, Roxana
AU - Saad, Helmi Ben
AU - Bencsik, Andrea
AU - Benning, Isaac
AU - Besimi, Adrian
AU - da Silva Bezerra, Denilson
AU - Buizza, Chiara
AU - Burro, Roberto
AU - Bwalya, Anthony
AU - Cachero, Cristina
AU - Castillo-Briceno, Patricia
AU - Castro, Harold
AU - Chai, Ching Sing
AU - Charalambous, Constadina
AU - Chiu, Thomas K.F.
AU - Clipa, Otilia
AU - Colombari, Ruggero
AU - Corral Escobedo, Luis José H.
AU - Costa, Elísio
AU - Creţulescu, Radu George
AU - Crispino, Marta
AU - Cucari, Nicola
AU - Dalton, Fergus
AU - Kaya, Meva Demir
AU - Dumić-Čule, Ivo
AU - Dwidienawati, Diena
AU - Ebardo, Ryan
AU - Egbenya, Daniel Lawer
AU - Faris, Moez Al Islam Ezzat
AU - Fečko, Miroslav
AU - Ferrinho, Paulo
AU - Florea, Adrian
AU - Nisiforou, Efi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Ravšelj et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - The paper presents the most comprehensive and large-scale global study to date on how higher education students perceived the use of ChatGPT in early 2024. With a sample of 23,218 students from 109 countries and territories, the study reveals that students primarily used ChatGPT for brainstorming, summarizing texts, and finding research articles, with a few using it for professional and creative writing. They found it useful for simplifying complex information and summarizing content, but less reliable for providing information and supporting classroom learning, though some considered its information clearer than that from peers and teachers. Moreover, students agreed on the need for AI regulations at all levels due to concerns about ChatGPT promoting cheating, plagiarism, and social isolation. However, they believed ChatGPT could potentially enhance their access to knowledge and improve their learning experience, study efficiency, and chances of achieving good grades. While ChatGPT was perceived as effective in potentially improving AI literacy, digital communication, and content creation skills, it was less useful for interpersonal communication, decision-making, numeracy, native language proficiency, and the development of critical thinking skills. Students also felt that ChatGPT would boost demand for AI-related skills and facilitate remote work without significantly impacting unemployment. Emotionally, students mostly felt positive using ChatGPT, with curiosity and calmness being the most common emotions. Further examinations reveal variations in students’ perceptions across different socio-demographic and geographic factors, with key factors influencing students’ use of ChatGPT also being identified. Higher education institutions’ managers and teachers may benefit from these findings while formulating the curricula and instructions/regulations for ChatGPT use, as well as when designing the teaching methods and assessment tools. Moreover, policymakers may also consider the findings when formulating strategies for secondary and higher education system development, especially in light of changing labor market needs and related digital skills development.
AB - The paper presents the most comprehensive and large-scale global study to date on how higher education students perceived the use of ChatGPT in early 2024. With a sample of 23,218 students from 109 countries and territories, the study reveals that students primarily used ChatGPT for brainstorming, summarizing texts, and finding research articles, with a few using it for professional and creative writing. They found it useful for simplifying complex information and summarizing content, but less reliable for providing information and supporting classroom learning, though some considered its information clearer than that from peers and teachers. Moreover, students agreed on the need for AI regulations at all levels due to concerns about ChatGPT promoting cheating, plagiarism, and social isolation. However, they believed ChatGPT could potentially enhance their access to knowledge and improve their learning experience, study efficiency, and chances of achieving good grades. While ChatGPT was perceived as effective in potentially improving AI literacy, digital communication, and content creation skills, it was less useful for interpersonal communication, decision-making, numeracy, native language proficiency, and the development of critical thinking skills. Students also felt that ChatGPT would boost demand for AI-related skills and facilitate remote work without significantly impacting unemployment. Emotionally, students mostly felt positive using ChatGPT, with curiosity and calmness being the most common emotions. Further examinations reveal variations in students’ perceptions across different socio-demographic and geographic factors, with key factors influencing students’ use of ChatGPT also being identified. Higher education institutions’ managers and teachers may benefit from these findings while formulating the curricula and instructions/regulations for ChatGPT use, as well as when designing the teaching methods and assessment tools. Moreover, policymakers may also consider the findings when formulating strategies for secondary and higher education system development, especially in light of changing labor market needs and related digital skills development.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85217552455
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0315011
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0315011
M3 - Article
C2 - 39908277
AN - SCOPUS:85217552455
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 20
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 2
M1 - e0315011
ER -