Is there still a place for conventional amphotericin B in the treatment of neonatal fungal infections?

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Neonatal invasive fungal infections (IFIs) remain an increasing problem associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, as well as late-onset neurodeve-lopmental implications. Invasive candidiasis remains the leading neonatal IFI. Candida albicans is the fungal species most often affecting this population, although a changing epidemiologic incidence to non-albicans Candida species is reported in some neonatal intensive care units. Many treatment recommendations are extrapolated from adult populations, emphasizing the need to establish the optimal antifungal agent, dosage, and duration of therapy in neonates. Historically, conventional amphotericin B has been considered an efficient and safe treatment approach for most neonatal IFIs. More recently, lipid formulations of amphotericin B have been studied, used alone or in combination with other antifungal agents such as azoles or echinocandins. The aim of this article is to review the published experience in the use of amphotericin B formulations to treat neonatal IFIs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-94
Number of pages14
JournalCurrent Fungal Infection Reports
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Amphotericin B
  • Antifungal agents
  • Candida infection
  • Candidiasis
  • Drug combinations
  • Fungal infections
  • Infants
  • Neonates
  • Treatment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is there still a place for conventional amphotericin B in the treatment of neonatal fungal infections?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this