Let me inform you how to tell a convincing story: CBCA and reality monitoring scores as a function of age, coaching, and deception

Aldert Vrij, Lucy Akehurst, Stavroula Soukara, Ray Bull

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The first aim of this experiment was to examine whether being informed about a method of detecting deception called Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) would increase participants' CBCA scores when deceptive so that they might then be classified as truthful. The second aim was to investigate whether Reality Monitoring could be used as an alternative tool for verbal lie detection. The third aim was to examine whether participants' social skills (social anxiety, self-monitoring, and social adroitness) affected their CBCA scores. Participants (aged 6-8, 11-12, 14-15, and undergraduates) participated in a "rubbing the blackboard" event. In a subsequent interview they told the truth or lied about the event, after they were or were not taught some CBCA criteria. Truth-tellers obtained higher CBCA scores than liars, and those who were informed about CBCA obtained higher scores than those who were not, except for the 6-8 year-olds. CBCA scores were also significantly correlated with social skills. Finally, Reality Monitoring was a useful alternative to CBCA for distinguishing between liars and truth-tellers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-126
Number of pages14
JournalCanadian Journal of Behavioural Science
Volume36
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2004

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Let me inform you how to tell a convincing story: CBCA and reality monitoring scores as a function of age, coaching, and deception'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this