Metacognitive monitoring in test-taking situations: A cross-cultural comparison of college students

Mariana V.C. Coutinho, Elena Papanastasiou, Stylianou Agni, John M. Vasko, Justin J. Couchman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    In this study, we examined monitoring accuracy during in class-exams for Emirati, American and Cypriot college students. In experiment 1, 120 students made local, confidence-ratings for each multiple-choice question in a psychology exam and also estimated their performance at the end of the exam. In experiment 2, to investigate the effect of practice in monitoring accuracy, 69 students made confidence judgments in two consecutive exams. In Experiment 3, to evaluate whether rating one's confidence aids exam performance, 172 students completed the exam either with or without providing confidence judgments. In all three cultures, confidence judgments were accurate indicators of performance, but there were significant cross-cultural differences that probably arose from regional educational practices. Additionally, global judgments were subjected to bias. Whereas American students overestimated their performance, Emiratis underestimated it. Practice alone with confidence judgments did little to improve monitoring accuracy. But there was a significant benefit for students who rated their confidence compared to those that did not. The results are discussed in light of the literature on metacognitive accuracy.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)407-424
    Number of pages18
    JournalInternational Journal of Instruction
    Volume13
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020

    Fingerprint

    intercultural comparison
    confidence
    monitoring
    student
    performance
    experiment
    rating
    educational practice
    cultural difference
    psychology
    trend

    Keywords

    • Cross-cultural study
    • Local and global judgments of confidence
    • Metacognition
    • Monitoring accuracy
    • Testing

    Cite this

    Coutinho, Mariana V.C. ; Papanastasiou, Elena ; Agni, Stylianou ; Vasko, John M. ; Couchman, Justin J. / Metacognitive monitoring in test-taking situations : A cross-cultural comparison of college students. In: International Journal of Instruction. 2020 ; Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 407-424.
    @article{cffa34a91b2a4a94b4b215e41ccff477,
    title = "Metacognitive monitoring in test-taking situations: A cross-cultural comparison of college students",
    abstract = "In this study, we examined monitoring accuracy during in class-exams for Emirati, American and Cypriot college students. In experiment 1, 120 students made local, confidence-ratings for each multiple-choice question in a psychology exam and also estimated their performance at the end of the exam. In experiment 2, to investigate the effect of practice in monitoring accuracy, 69 students made confidence judgments in two consecutive exams. In Experiment 3, to evaluate whether rating one's confidence aids exam performance, 172 students completed the exam either with or without providing confidence judgments. In all three cultures, confidence judgments were accurate indicators of performance, but there were significant cross-cultural differences that probably arose from regional educational practices. Additionally, global judgments were subjected to bias. Whereas American students overestimated their performance, Emiratis underestimated it. Practice alone with confidence judgments did little to improve monitoring accuracy. But there was a significant benefit for students who rated their confidence compared to those that did not. The results are discussed in light of the literature on metacognitive accuracy.",
    keywords = "Cross-cultural study, Local and global judgments of confidence, Metacognition, Monitoring accuracy, Testing",
    author = "Coutinho, {Mariana V.C.} and Elena Papanastasiou and Stylianou Agni and Vasko, {John M.} and Couchman, {Justin J.}",
    year = "2020",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.29333/iji.2020.13127a",
    language = "English",
    volume = "13",
    pages = "407--424",
    journal = "International Journal of Instruction",
    issn = "1694-609X",
    number = "1",

    }

    Metacognitive monitoring in test-taking situations : A cross-cultural comparison of college students. / Coutinho, Mariana V.C.; Papanastasiou, Elena; Agni, Stylianou; Vasko, John M.; Couchman, Justin J.

    In: International Journal of Instruction, Vol. 13, No. 1, 01.01.2020, p. 407-424.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Metacognitive monitoring in test-taking situations

    T2 - A cross-cultural comparison of college students

    AU - Coutinho, Mariana V.C.

    AU - Papanastasiou, Elena

    AU - Agni, Stylianou

    AU - Vasko, John M.

    AU - Couchman, Justin J.

    PY - 2020/1/1

    Y1 - 2020/1/1

    N2 - In this study, we examined monitoring accuracy during in class-exams for Emirati, American and Cypriot college students. In experiment 1, 120 students made local, confidence-ratings for each multiple-choice question in a psychology exam and also estimated their performance at the end of the exam. In experiment 2, to investigate the effect of practice in monitoring accuracy, 69 students made confidence judgments in two consecutive exams. In Experiment 3, to evaluate whether rating one's confidence aids exam performance, 172 students completed the exam either with or without providing confidence judgments. In all three cultures, confidence judgments were accurate indicators of performance, but there were significant cross-cultural differences that probably arose from regional educational practices. Additionally, global judgments were subjected to bias. Whereas American students overestimated their performance, Emiratis underestimated it. Practice alone with confidence judgments did little to improve monitoring accuracy. But there was a significant benefit for students who rated their confidence compared to those that did not. The results are discussed in light of the literature on metacognitive accuracy.

    AB - In this study, we examined monitoring accuracy during in class-exams for Emirati, American and Cypriot college students. In experiment 1, 120 students made local, confidence-ratings for each multiple-choice question in a psychology exam and also estimated their performance at the end of the exam. In experiment 2, to investigate the effect of practice in monitoring accuracy, 69 students made confidence judgments in two consecutive exams. In Experiment 3, to evaluate whether rating one's confidence aids exam performance, 172 students completed the exam either with or without providing confidence judgments. In all three cultures, confidence judgments were accurate indicators of performance, but there were significant cross-cultural differences that probably arose from regional educational practices. Additionally, global judgments were subjected to bias. Whereas American students overestimated their performance, Emiratis underestimated it. Practice alone with confidence judgments did little to improve monitoring accuracy. But there was a significant benefit for students who rated their confidence compared to those that did not. The results are discussed in light of the literature on metacognitive accuracy.

    KW - Cross-cultural study

    KW - Local and global judgments of confidence

    KW - Metacognition

    KW - Monitoring accuracy

    KW - Testing

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077292114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.29333/iji.2020.13127a

    DO - 10.29333/iji.2020.13127a

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85077292114

    VL - 13

    SP - 407

    EP - 424

    JO - International Journal of Instruction

    JF - International Journal of Instruction

    SN - 1694-609X

    IS - 1

    ER -