Multigroup invariance of the DAS across a random and an internet-sourced sample

M. J.M. Sullman, A. N. Stephens, J. E. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It is well established that angry and, subsequently, aggressive drivers pose a problem for road safety. Over recent years, there has been an increase in the number of published studies examining driver anger, particularly using the Driving Anger Scale (DAS). The DAS measures six broad types of situations likely to provoke anger while driving (i.e., police presence, illegal driving, discourtesy, traffic obstructions, slower drivers, and hostile gestures). The majority of the recent studies have moved away from traditional paper-and-pencil methodologies, using the internet to collect data, for reasons of convenience. However, it is not yet completely clear whether data obtained from this methodology differs from more traditional methods. While research outside of the driving arena has not found substantial differences, it is important to establish whether this also applies to driving-related research and measures, such as the DAS. The present study used Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MGCFA) to investigate the invariance of the DAS across a random sample from the electoral roll (n = 1,081: males = 45%) and an internet sourced sample (n = 627; males = 55%). The MGCFA showed the same six-factor solution was supported in both datasets. The relationships between the DAS factors and age, sex, trait anger, and annual mileage were broadly similar, although more significant differences were identified in the internet sample. This research demonstrates that driving measures administered over the internet produce similar results to those obtained using more traditional methods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-145
Number of pages9
JournalAccident Analysis and Prevention
Volume131
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Anger
Invariance
anger
Internet
Factor analysis
driver
Law enforcement
Statistical Factor Analysis
factor analysis
Research
Sex Factors
Gestures
Age Factors
methodology
Police
random sample
police
road
traffic
Safety

Keywords

  • DAS
  • Driver anger
  • Measurement invariance
  • Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis
  • Online survey
  • Paper-and-pencil survey

Cite this

@article{f4e33a2a472d48b08735f4a305cfec4d,
title = "Multigroup invariance of the DAS across a random and an internet-sourced sample",
abstract = "It is well established that angry and, subsequently, aggressive drivers pose a problem for road safety. Over recent years, there has been an increase in the number of published studies examining driver anger, particularly using the Driving Anger Scale (DAS). The DAS measures six broad types of situations likely to provoke anger while driving (i.e., police presence, illegal driving, discourtesy, traffic obstructions, slower drivers, and hostile gestures). The majority of the recent studies have moved away from traditional paper-and-pencil methodologies, using the internet to collect data, for reasons of convenience. However, it is not yet completely clear whether data obtained from this methodology differs from more traditional methods. While research outside of the driving arena has not found substantial differences, it is important to establish whether this also applies to driving-related research and measures, such as the DAS. The present study used Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MGCFA) to investigate the invariance of the DAS across a random sample from the electoral roll (n = 1,081: males = 45{\%}) and an internet sourced sample (n = 627; males = 55{\%}). The MGCFA showed the same six-factor solution was supported in both datasets. The relationships between the DAS factors and age, sex, trait anger, and annual mileage were broadly similar, although more significant differences were identified in the internet sample. This research demonstrates that driving measures administered over the internet produce similar results to those obtained using more traditional methods.",
keywords = "DAS, Driver anger, Measurement invariance, Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis, Online survey, Paper-and-pencil survey",
author = "Sullman, {M. J.M.} and Stephens, {A. N.} and Taylor, {J. E.}",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.aap.2019.06.013",
language = "English",
volume = "131",
pages = "137--145",
journal = "Accident Analysis and Prevention",
issn = "0001-4575",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

Multigroup invariance of the DAS across a random and an internet-sourced sample. / Sullman, M. J.M.; Stephens, A. N.; Taylor, J. E.

In: Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 131, 01.10.2019, p. 137-145.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multigroup invariance of the DAS across a random and an internet-sourced sample

AU - Sullman, M. J.M.

AU - Stephens, A. N.

AU - Taylor, J. E.

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - It is well established that angry and, subsequently, aggressive drivers pose a problem for road safety. Over recent years, there has been an increase in the number of published studies examining driver anger, particularly using the Driving Anger Scale (DAS). The DAS measures six broad types of situations likely to provoke anger while driving (i.e., police presence, illegal driving, discourtesy, traffic obstructions, slower drivers, and hostile gestures). The majority of the recent studies have moved away from traditional paper-and-pencil methodologies, using the internet to collect data, for reasons of convenience. However, it is not yet completely clear whether data obtained from this methodology differs from more traditional methods. While research outside of the driving arena has not found substantial differences, it is important to establish whether this also applies to driving-related research and measures, such as the DAS. The present study used Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MGCFA) to investigate the invariance of the DAS across a random sample from the electoral roll (n = 1,081: males = 45%) and an internet sourced sample (n = 627; males = 55%). The MGCFA showed the same six-factor solution was supported in both datasets. The relationships between the DAS factors and age, sex, trait anger, and annual mileage were broadly similar, although more significant differences were identified in the internet sample. This research demonstrates that driving measures administered over the internet produce similar results to those obtained using more traditional methods.

AB - It is well established that angry and, subsequently, aggressive drivers pose a problem for road safety. Over recent years, there has been an increase in the number of published studies examining driver anger, particularly using the Driving Anger Scale (DAS). The DAS measures six broad types of situations likely to provoke anger while driving (i.e., police presence, illegal driving, discourtesy, traffic obstructions, slower drivers, and hostile gestures). The majority of the recent studies have moved away from traditional paper-and-pencil methodologies, using the internet to collect data, for reasons of convenience. However, it is not yet completely clear whether data obtained from this methodology differs from more traditional methods. While research outside of the driving arena has not found substantial differences, it is important to establish whether this also applies to driving-related research and measures, such as the DAS. The present study used Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MGCFA) to investigate the invariance of the DAS across a random sample from the electoral roll (n = 1,081: males = 45%) and an internet sourced sample (n = 627; males = 55%). The MGCFA showed the same six-factor solution was supported in both datasets. The relationships between the DAS factors and age, sex, trait anger, and annual mileage were broadly similar, although more significant differences were identified in the internet sample. This research demonstrates that driving measures administered over the internet produce similar results to those obtained using more traditional methods.

KW - DAS

KW - Driver anger

KW - Measurement invariance

KW - Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis

KW - Online survey

KW - Paper-and-pencil survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067940195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.aap.2019.06.013

DO - 10.1016/j.aap.2019.06.013

M3 - Article

VL - 131

SP - 137

EP - 145

JO - Accident Analysis and Prevention

JF - Accident Analysis and Prevention

SN - 0001-4575

ER -