Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidies: New technologies and clinical applications

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) has substantial medical importance as it targets the development of safer and more effective methods to avoid the risk of fetal loss associated with currently used invasive methods. Several approaches have been demonstrated as being proof-of concept for NIPD of chromosomal aneuploidies. These approaches include cell-based and cell-free detection methods, involving the investigation of fetal cells in the maternal circulation, formaldehyde treatment of maternal plasma, DNA methylation studies using sodium bisulfite or restriction enzymes, protein-based studies, identification of fetal-specific mRNAs and digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) approaches, and recently next-generation sequencing and methylated DNA immunoprecipitation real-time quantitative PCR-based approaches. Although all these NIPD methods have both advantages and limitations, some are moving closer to clinical implementation. Biotechnology companies dedicated to the development of NIPD tests such as the sequencing- or methylation-based approaches are finalizing large clinical trials. It is expected that these new technologies will facilitate safer, more sensitive and accurate prenatal diagnostic tests in the near future. In this review, we highlight the most recent advances in methods for NIPD of aneuploidies, and we discuss their future implications in clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
Article number46
JournalGenome Medicine
Volume4
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 May 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Fetal DNA
  • Fetal-specific methylation
  • Next generation sequencing
  • NIPD clinical implementation
  • Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidies: New technologies and clinical applications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this