TY - JOUR
T1 - Non-invasive screening for renal artery stenosis with ultrasound contrast enhancement
AU - Missouris, Constantinos G.
AU - Allen, Clare M.
AU - Balen, Frances G.
AU - Buckenham, Tim
AU - Lees, William R.
AU - MacGregor, Graham A.
PY - 1996
Y1 - 1996
N2 - Objective. Our aim was to evaluate duplex ultrasound imaging in the identification of renal artery stenosis using a new technique to enhance the recorded Doppler signal. Design. Colour Doppler studies of interlobar renal arteries were performed before and after enhancement using an intravenous contrast of galactose microparticle suspension containing microbubbles (Levovist, Schering) in patients with angiographically confirmed renal artery stenosis. Setting. Blood Pressure Unit, St. George's Hospital Medical School, and Department of Radiology, The Middlesex Hospital, London, UK. Participants. Twenty-one consecutive hypertensive patients in whom the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis was made on digital subtraction angiography. Main outcome measures. The diagnosis of haemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis (≥ 60% on angiography). Results. With Levovist, there was a 20 db increase in the Doppler intensity and, as a result, intrarenal signals were much more clearly delineated and distinct spectral waveforms were obtained from all but one kidney, which was occluded. Significant associations were found between the degree of stenosis (as assessed by angiography) and the following Doppler parameters: diastolic velocity (F = 7.6; P < 0.01), acceleration time (F = 33.5, < 0.0001), peak systolic velocity (F = 37.7, P < 0.0001) and acceleration (F = 60.0; P < 0.0001). Without enhancement, there were five false-positive and two false-negative examinations (sensitivity 85%; specificity 79%) using the acceleration cut-off value of 3.5 m/s2 to identify haemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis (≥ 60% on angiography). After contrast enhancement, there were only three false-positive and one false-negative examinations (sensitivity 94% and specificity of 88%) using the acceleration cut-off value of 3.75 m/s2 and the examination time was reduced by approximately half (sensitivity and specificity of 90% using the acceleration cut-off value of 3.5 m/s2). Conclusions. Our results suggest that renal duplex scanning using contrast enhancement is a promising new non-invasive technique in screening patients with suspected renal artery stenosis. Contrast enhancement produces more reproducible spectral waveforms, improves accuracy and halves the examination time.
AB - Objective. Our aim was to evaluate duplex ultrasound imaging in the identification of renal artery stenosis using a new technique to enhance the recorded Doppler signal. Design. Colour Doppler studies of interlobar renal arteries were performed before and after enhancement using an intravenous contrast of galactose microparticle suspension containing microbubbles (Levovist, Schering) in patients with angiographically confirmed renal artery stenosis. Setting. Blood Pressure Unit, St. George's Hospital Medical School, and Department of Radiology, The Middlesex Hospital, London, UK. Participants. Twenty-one consecutive hypertensive patients in whom the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis was made on digital subtraction angiography. Main outcome measures. The diagnosis of haemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis (≥ 60% on angiography). Results. With Levovist, there was a 20 db increase in the Doppler intensity and, as a result, intrarenal signals were much more clearly delineated and distinct spectral waveforms were obtained from all but one kidney, which was occluded. Significant associations were found between the degree of stenosis (as assessed by angiography) and the following Doppler parameters: diastolic velocity (F = 7.6; P < 0.01), acceleration time (F = 33.5, < 0.0001), peak systolic velocity (F = 37.7, P < 0.0001) and acceleration (F = 60.0; P < 0.0001). Without enhancement, there were five false-positive and two false-negative examinations (sensitivity 85%; specificity 79%) using the acceleration cut-off value of 3.5 m/s2 to identify haemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis (≥ 60% on angiography). After contrast enhancement, there were only three false-positive and one false-negative examinations (sensitivity 94% and specificity of 88%) using the acceleration cut-off value of 3.75 m/s2 and the examination time was reduced by approximately half (sensitivity and specificity of 90% using the acceleration cut-off value of 3.5 m/s2). Conclusions. Our results suggest that renal duplex scanning using contrast enhancement is a promising new non-invasive technique in screening patients with suspected renal artery stenosis. Contrast enhancement produces more reproducible spectral waveforms, improves accuracy and halves the examination time.
KW - Contrast enhancement
KW - Doppler ultrasound
KW - Renal artery stenosis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0029982320
U2 - 10.1097/00004872-199604000-00016
DO - 10.1097/00004872-199604000-00016
M3 - Article
C2 - 8761903
AN - SCOPUS:0029982320
SN - 0263-6352
VL - 14
SP - 519
EP - 524
JO - Journal of Hypertension
JF - Journal of Hypertension
IS - 4
ER -