TY - JOUR
T1 - Reflection on knowledge transfer methodologies in Eastern/Western European co-operations
AU - Bengoa, Dolores Sánchez
AU - Kaufmann, Hans Rüdiger
AU - Orange, Graham
PY - 2009/7/17
Y1 - 2009/7/17
N2 - Purpose-In order to win the global race for innovation as a source for competitive advantage, many companies enter into any kind of business co-operation. Beyond intending to grow merely quantitatively, co-operation partners should target to commonly create new knowledge and to transfer knowledge as a basis for qualitative growth. This apparent deficiency of practitioners is compounded by a lack of theory and empirical research on intercultural knowledge transfer. This task becomes even more daunting, when co-operation partners transcend borders, and the knowledge transfer process becomes impacted by national cultures. This paper aims to present empirical research that illuminates the effects which national cultures have on the transfer of knowledge between Central/Eastern Europe (CEE) using Russia as a case study, and Western European partners. Design/methodology/approach-The paper applies a phenomenological approach applying grounded theory for data generation and analysis. The research method is a case study, and as research techniques 11 interviews with senior Russian managers and academics were conducted and three participant observation events in Russian settings were chosen. The researchers applied a fundamental shift from a mere comparative study of cultural differences to the study of interactions. Findings-This stage of the research presents a reflection on Eastern perceptions on Western knowledge transfer methodologies related mainly to the content of the knowledge as well as the attitudes when transferring knowledge. In addition, a self-reflection on the characteristics of the Russian knowledge receivers is provided. Research limitations/implications-Limitations of this research refer to a lack of differentiation as to ownership, type of co-operation, company size or industry type. It has to be underlined that the focus of the research was to concentrate on the holistic problems that were not sufficiently addressed in previous research. On this basis more specific and differentiated further research can be conducted. Originality/value-This research aimed to develop an understanding of why Eastern and Western European partners experience different barriers when transferring and receiving knowledge and provides recommendations to overcome the barriers. It facilitates an understanding of the feelings and obstacles in the learning process between Russian and Western European partners serving as a reflective and eye-opening starting point for urgently required theory generation and change of attitudes. The paper contributes to the development of a coherent body of knowledge in the field. Contemporary authors criticise the lack of research on a dyadic level and theory on intercultural knowledge transfer. This research addresses these shortcomings by having selected respondents that are currently involved in Eastern/Western co-operations and by comparing Eastern and Western perspectives at a later research stage.
AB - Purpose-In order to win the global race for innovation as a source for competitive advantage, many companies enter into any kind of business co-operation. Beyond intending to grow merely quantitatively, co-operation partners should target to commonly create new knowledge and to transfer knowledge as a basis for qualitative growth. This apparent deficiency of practitioners is compounded by a lack of theory and empirical research on intercultural knowledge transfer. This task becomes even more daunting, when co-operation partners transcend borders, and the knowledge transfer process becomes impacted by national cultures. This paper aims to present empirical research that illuminates the effects which national cultures have on the transfer of knowledge between Central/Eastern Europe (CEE) using Russia as a case study, and Western European partners. Design/methodology/approach-The paper applies a phenomenological approach applying grounded theory for data generation and analysis. The research method is a case study, and as research techniques 11 interviews with senior Russian managers and academics were conducted and three participant observation events in Russian settings were chosen. The researchers applied a fundamental shift from a mere comparative study of cultural differences to the study of interactions. Findings-This stage of the research presents a reflection on Eastern perceptions on Western knowledge transfer methodologies related mainly to the content of the knowledge as well as the attitudes when transferring knowledge. In addition, a self-reflection on the characteristics of the Russian knowledge receivers is provided. Research limitations/implications-Limitations of this research refer to a lack of differentiation as to ownership, type of co-operation, company size or industry type. It has to be underlined that the focus of the research was to concentrate on the holistic problems that were not sufficiently addressed in previous research. On this basis more specific and differentiated further research can be conducted. Originality/value-This research aimed to develop an understanding of why Eastern and Western European partners experience different barriers when transferring and receiving knowledge and provides recommendations to overcome the barriers. It facilitates an understanding of the feelings and obstacles in the learning process between Russian and Western European partners serving as a reflective and eye-opening starting point for urgently required theory generation and change of attitudes. The paper contributes to the development of a coherent body of knowledge in the field. Contemporary authors criticise the lack of research on a dyadic level and theory on intercultural knowledge transfer. This research addresses these shortcomings by having selected respondents that are currently involved in Eastern/Western co-operations and by comparing Eastern and Western perspectives at a later research stage.
KW - Cross-cultural management
KW - Knowledge transfer
KW - Russia
KW - Teaching methods
KW - Western Europe
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865473350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/14502190910976493
DO - 10.1108/14502190910976493
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84865473350
SN - 1450-2194
VL - 4
SP - 127
EP - 142
JO - EuroMed Journal of Business
JF - EuroMed Journal of Business
IS - 2
ER -