TY - JOUR
T1 - Serum hepcidin, the hepcidin/ferritin ratio and the risk of type 2 diabetes
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Karamzad, Nahid
AU - Eftekhari, Aziz
AU - Ashrafi-Asgarabad, Ahad
AU - Sullman, Mark J.M.
AU - Sahebkar, Amirhossein
AU - Safiri, Saeid
N1 - Funding Information:
This paper has been supported by Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (No. 20984).
Funding Information:
We would like to thank Social Determinants of Health Research Center of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences for their financial support.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Bentham Science Publishers.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Objectives: To perform a meta-analysis on the relationship type 2 diabetes has with serum hepcidin and the hepcidin/ferritin ratio. Methods: The following databases were searched using all relevant keywords: Web of Science, Med-line, Scopus, Embase and Google Scholar. All studies that examined the relationship type 2 diabetes has with serum hepcidin or the hepcidin/ferritin ratio were included in this meta-analysis and systematic review provided, were published in English between 2011 and 2018. A random-effects model was used to pool the standardized mean difference (SMD). Results: The SMD of serum hepcidin among patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy controls were compared across eight studies (ncases=878; ncontrols=2306). The pooled SMD of serum hepcidin did not differ significantly between study groups (SMD: 0.04; 95% confidence interval (CI):-0.29 to 0.35). In contrast, the serum hepcidin/ferritin ratio was examined across five studies (ncases=229; ncontrols=1426) and was found to be negatively associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes (SMD:-0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI):-0.85 to-0.19). There was no publication bias found for the associations serum hepcidin (Egger´s test: P =0.97) or the hepcidin/ferritin ratio (Egger´s test: P =0.75) had with type 2 diabetes. Conclusion: Although hepcidin has been proposed as a risk marker for type 2 diabetes, our meta-analysis found that the hepcidin/ferritin ratio was superior to hepcidin alone as a risk marker.
AB - Objectives: To perform a meta-analysis on the relationship type 2 diabetes has with serum hepcidin and the hepcidin/ferritin ratio. Methods: The following databases were searched using all relevant keywords: Web of Science, Med-line, Scopus, Embase and Google Scholar. All studies that examined the relationship type 2 diabetes has with serum hepcidin or the hepcidin/ferritin ratio were included in this meta-analysis and systematic review provided, were published in English between 2011 and 2018. A random-effects model was used to pool the standardized mean difference (SMD). Results: The SMD of serum hepcidin among patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy controls were compared across eight studies (ncases=878; ncontrols=2306). The pooled SMD of serum hepcidin did not differ significantly between study groups (SMD: 0.04; 95% confidence interval (CI):-0.29 to 0.35). In contrast, the serum hepcidin/ferritin ratio was examined across five studies (ncases=229; ncontrols=1426) and was found to be negatively associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes (SMD:-0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI):-0.85 to-0.19). There was no publication bias found for the associations serum hepcidin (Egger´s test: P =0.97) or the hepcidin/ferritin ratio (Egger´s test: P =0.75) had with type 2 diabetes. Conclusion: Although hepcidin has been proposed as a risk marker for type 2 diabetes, our meta-analysis found that the hepcidin/ferritin ratio was superior to hepcidin alone as a risk marker.
KW - Ferritins
KW - Hepcidin/ Ferritin Ratio
KW - Hepcidins
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Risk marker
KW - Serum Hepcidin
KW - Study groups
KW - Type 2 diabetes mellitus
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103520244&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2174/0929867327666200207120158
DO - 10.2174/0929867327666200207120158
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32031063
AN - SCOPUS:85103520244
SN - 0929-8673
VL - 28
SP - 1224
EP - 1233
JO - Current Medicinal Chemistry
JF - Current Medicinal Chemistry
IS - 6
ER -