Statistical, machine learning and deep learning forecasting methods: Comparisons and ways forward

Spyros Makridakis, Evangelos Spiliotis, Vassilios Assimakopoulos, Artemios Anargyros Semenoglou, Gary Mulder, Konstantinos Nikolopoulos

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The purpose of this paper is to test empirically the value currently added by Deep Learning (DL) approaches in time series forecasting by comparing the accuracy of some state-of-the-art DL methods with that of popular Machine Learning (ML) and statistical ones. The paper consists of three main parts. The first part summarizes the results of a past study that compared statistical with ML methods using a subset of the M3 data, extending however its results to include DL models, developed using the GluonTS toolkit. The second part widens the study by considering all M3 series and comparing the results obtained with that of other studies that have used the same data for evaluating new forecasting methods. We find that combinations of DL models perform better than most standard models, both statistical and ML, especially for the case of monthly series and long-term forecasts. However, these improvements come at the cost of significantly increased computational time. Finally, the third part describes the advantages and drawbacks of DL methods, discussing the implications of our findings to the practice of forecasting. We conclude the paper by discussing how the field of forecasting has evolved over time and proposing some directions for future research.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)840-859
    Number of pages20
    JournalJournal of the Operational Research Society
    Volume74
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2023

    Keywords

    • artificial intelligence
    • Forecasting
    • neural networks
    • performance measurement
    • time series

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Statistical, machine learning and deep learning forecasting methods: Comparisons and ways forward'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this