TY - JOUR
T1 - The Effect of Probiotics on the Management of Pain and Inflammation in Osteoarthritis
T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies
AU - Moyseos, Maria
AU - Michael, Jenny
AU - Ferreira, Nuno
AU - Sophocleous, Antonia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the authors.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders. Recently, research has focused on the role of intestinal microbiome dysbiosis in OA. The aim of this study was to systematically review randomized intervention clinical studies investigating the effect of probiotics on the management of OA-related pain and inflammation. Pre-clinical studies and non-randomized trials were excluded. A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Study quality was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias (RoB2) tool and the Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) scale. RevMan was used for the meta-analysis. Outcome measures assessed self-reported pain, stiffness and impediment, and serum hs-CRP. Three studies, with 501 participants, were considered eligible for qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis. A significant reduction in symptoms across all outcomes measured, except stiffness, was evident with Lactobacillus casei Shirota. However, all other probiotics reviewed did not seem to have any effect on the measured outcomes. Pre-clinical evidence, along with the RCTs reviewed, suggests that probiotics of the Lactobacillus strains might be of use for managing pain and inflammation in OA. Considering the small number of studies included in the present review and the possible risk of bias, we conclude that further studies on the role of probiotics in humans with OA are warranted.
AB - Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders. Recently, research has focused on the role of intestinal microbiome dysbiosis in OA. The aim of this study was to systematically review randomized intervention clinical studies investigating the effect of probiotics on the management of OA-related pain and inflammation. Pre-clinical studies and non-randomized trials were excluded. A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Study quality was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias (RoB2) tool and the Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) scale. RevMan was used for the meta-analysis. Outcome measures assessed self-reported pain, stiffness and impediment, and serum hs-CRP. Three studies, with 501 participants, were considered eligible for qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis. A significant reduction in symptoms across all outcomes measured, except stiffness, was evident with Lactobacillus casei Shirota. However, all other probiotics reviewed did not seem to have any effect on the measured outcomes. Pre-clinical evidence, along with the RCTs reviewed, suggests that probiotics of the Lactobacillus strains might be of use for managing pain and inflammation in OA. Considering the small number of studies included in the present review and the possible risk of bias, we conclude that further studies on the role of probiotics in humans with OA are warranted.
KW - articular cartilage damage
KW - inflammation
KW - meta-analysis
KW - osteoarthritis
KW - pain
KW - probiotics
KW - systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85199558034&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/nu16142243
DO - 10.3390/nu16142243
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39064686
AN - SCOPUS:85199558034
SN - 2072-6643
VL - 16
JO - Nutrients
JF - Nutrients
IS - 14
M1 - 2243
ER -