TY - JOUR
T1 - The experiences of palliative care professionals and their responses to work-related stress
T2 - A qualitative study
AU - Fisher, Shaun
AU - Gillanders, David
AU - Ferreira, Nuno
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 British Psychological Society
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Objectives: Previous qualitative research has demonstrated that palliative care professionals (PCPs) deal with a wide array of emotionally challenging issues associated with the care they provide. Although previous research has identified self-care strategies PCPs engage in, there is a lack of focus on what responses are helpful and/or unhelpful. The aim of the current study is to understand and describe the experiences of PCPs and to explore the helpful and unhelpful responses to work-related stress they employ. Design: This was a qualitative study of the experiences of working PCPs in a hospice setting. Methods: Nine semi-structured interviews were conducted and subsequently analysed using the framework method. Results: The current study revealed five overarching themes: (1) Sources of Meaning and Purpose (making a difference, personal growth), (2) Sources of Stress (emotional challenges, patient family dynamics, work environment factors, public perception, uncontrollability of symptoms), (3) Personal Impact (life engagement, perceptions of death), (4) Unhelpful Responses (self-doubt, emotional suppression, rumination, overidentifying, lack of self-care), and (5) Helpful Responses (acceptance, being present, perspective taking, being able to switch off, social support, active self-care). Conclusions: The experiences of PCPs can be interpreted from or directly mapped onto the psychological (in)flexibility model in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). It is suggested that ACT training for professionals may encourage more reliable and explicit helpful responses and reduce the impact of unhelpful responses. Thus, an ACT training intervention may enhance wellbeing and effectiveness in PCPs.
AB - Objectives: Previous qualitative research has demonstrated that palliative care professionals (PCPs) deal with a wide array of emotionally challenging issues associated with the care they provide. Although previous research has identified self-care strategies PCPs engage in, there is a lack of focus on what responses are helpful and/or unhelpful. The aim of the current study is to understand and describe the experiences of PCPs and to explore the helpful and unhelpful responses to work-related stress they employ. Design: This was a qualitative study of the experiences of working PCPs in a hospice setting. Methods: Nine semi-structured interviews were conducted and subsequently analysed using the framework method. Results: The current study revealed five overarching themes: (1) Sources of Meaning and Purpose (making a difference, personal growth), (2) Sources of Stress (emotional challenges, patient family dynamics, work environment factors, public perception, uncontrollability of symptoms), (3) Personal Impact (life engagement, perceptions of death), (4) Unhelpful Responses (self-doubt, emotional suppression, rumination, overidentifying, lack of self-care), and (5) Helpful Responses (acceptance, being present, perspective taking, being able to switch off, social support, active self-care). Conclusions: The experiences of PCPs can be interpreted from or directly mapped onto the psychological (in)flexibility model in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). It is suggested that ACT training for professionals may encourage more reliable and explicit helpful responses and reduce the impact of unhelpful responses. Thus, an ACT training intervention may enhance wellbeing and effectiveness in PCPs.
KW - burnout
KW - coping
KW - framework method
KW - meaning and purpose
KW - palliative care professionals
KW - psychological flexibility
KW - qualitative methods
KW - stress
KW - wellbeing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117502228&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/bjhp.12565
DO - 10.1111/bjhp.12565
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85117502228
SN - 1359-107X
JO - British Journal of Health Psychology
JF - British Journal of Health Psychology
ER -