TY - JOUR
T1 - The national question in Cyprus and the Cypriot Communist left in the Era of British Colonialism (1922– 59)
AU - Katsourides, Yiannos
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2014/10/2
Y1 - 2014/10/2
N2 - This paper considers AKEL’s (Progressive Party of the Working People) stance on Cyprus’s national issue in the era of British colonialism (1922– 59). For analytical purposes, the time span is divided into two periods. The first period covers the years 1922–41, the years during which the CPC (Communist Party of Cyprus) was functioning. The second period extends from AKEL’s foundation in 1941 to the declaration of Cyprus’s independence in 1959. The analytical framework focuses on five parameters that will illuminate the Cypriot communist left’s strategies, tactics and responses to the various developments and phases of the national issue of Cyprus in the period under study: the age of the party; the colonial status of Cyprus; external influences; intra-party conflicts; political opposition. It is argued that the national issue precluded presentation of a socialist agenda to the people of Cyprus, but it also helped AKEL reach out for alliances with other political forces and personalities, and gain and retain a prominent role in Cypriot politics.
AB - This paper considers AKEL’s (Progressive Party of the Working People) stance on Cyprus’s national issue in the era of British colonialism (1922– 59). For analytical purposes, the time span is divided into two periods. The first period covers the years 1922–41, the years during which the CPC (Communist Party of Cyprus) was functioning. The second period extends from AKEL’s foundation in 1941 to the declaration of Cyprus’s independence in 1959. The analytical framework focuses on five parameters that will illuminate the Cypriot communist left’s strategies, tactics and responses to the various developments and phases of the national issue of Cyprus in the period under study: the age of the party; the colonial status of Cyprus; external influences; intra-party conflicts; political opposition. It is argued that the national issue precluded presentation of a socialist agenda to the people of Cyprus, but it also helped AKEL reach out for alliances with other political forces and personalities, and gain and retain a prominent role in Cypriot politics.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84916200665
U2 - 10.1080/19448953.2014.940765
DO - 10.1080/19448953.2014.940765
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84916200665
SN - 1944-8953
VL - 16
SP - 474
EP - 501
JO - Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies
JF - Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies
IS - 4
ER -