The Nature of Parent-Offspring Conflict over Mating: from Differences in Genetic Relatedness to Disagreement over Mate Choice

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Parents and children are genetically related, but they are not genetically identical. This difference leads to diverging interests and ensuing conflict. There are two, not mutual exclusive, hypotheses that propose to account for how the divergence in genetic interests leads to conflict over mating, namely the compromises in traits and the evolutionary trade-offs. The present paper attempts to demonstrate that the compromises in trait hypothesis can account for this conflict, but the evolutionary trade-off hypothesis cannot. It also aims to combine insights from the two hypotheses in order to provide a better account of the nature of parent-offspring conflict over mating. In the proposed synthesis, compromises in desirable traits lead to parent-offspring conflict over mating, with evolutionary trade-offs regulating the degree of this conflict depending on the sex of the child exercising mate choice and the local conditions.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)62-71
    Number of pages10
    JournalEvolutionary Psychological Science
    Volume3
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2017

    Keywords

    • Compromises in traits
    • Evolutionary trade-offs
    • Parent-offspring conflict
    • Parent-offspring conflict over mating

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Nature of Parent-Offspring Conflict over Mating: from Differences in Genetic Relatedness to Disagreement over Mate Choice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this