Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The psychology of offensive and defensive intergroup violence: Preregistered insights from 58 countries

  • Jonas R. Kunst
  • , Tomasz Besta
  • , Michał Jaśkiewicz
  • , Anna Natalia Gajda
  • , Markus Sanden
  • , Mina Marie Flatebø
  • , Sulaiman Olanrewaju Adebayo
  • , Marios Adonis
  • , Collins Badu Agyemang
  • , Raymond Agyenim Boateng
  • , Serap Arslan Akfirat
  • , Samir Al-Adawi
  • , Chiara Ambrosio
  • , Gulnaz Anjum
  • , John Jamir Benzon R. Aruta
  • , Ivars Austers
  • , Oumar Barry
  • , Brock Bastian
  • , Maja Becker
  • , Michael Bender
  • Nora Cornelia Glerud Benningstad, Islam Borinca, Göksu Celikkol, Jiří Čeněk, Trawin Chaleeraktrakoon, Phatthanakit Chobthamkit, Hoon Seok Choi, Suyeong Choi, Patricia Ciordas, Ann Cathrin Coenen, Aleksandra Cupta, Piyanjali de Zoysa, Sandesh Dhakal, Lauren E. Duncan, Tuğçenaz Elcil, Barkan Eskiili, Edgardo Etchezahar, Renata Franc, Silvia Galdi, Magdalena Garvanova, Paul Gill, Augusto Gnisci, Angel Gómez, Talía Gómez Yepes, Igor Grossmann, Emily A. Haines, Fatjona Haka, Boaz Hameiri, Imaduddin Hamzah, Mark J.M. Sullman
  • BI Norwegian Business School
  • University of Gdańsk
  • University of Oslo
  • Ekiti State University
  • Department of Social Sciences
  • University of Ghana
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University
  • Dokuz Eylul University
  • Sultan Qaboos University
  • University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli
  • University of Limerick
  • De La Salle University-Manila
  • University of Latvia
  • Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar
  • University of Melbourne
  • Université de Toulouse
  • Tilburg University
  • University of Groningen
  • Mendel University in Brno
  • Thammasat University
  • Sungkyunkwan University
  • University of Waterloo
  • Eötvös Loránd University
  • University of Colombo
  • Tribhuvan University
  • Smith College
  • Gedik University
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • Ivo Pilar Institute of Social Sciences
  • University of Library Studies and Information Technologies
  • University College London
  • National Distance Education University
  • University of Johannesburg
  • Flinders University
  • University of Tirana
  • Tel Aviv University
  • Politeknik Pengayoman Indonesia

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Evolutionary theory and historical evidence suggest humans possess distinct psychological tendencies for defensive and offensive violence, which have insufficiently been considered in research. In a large-scale preregistered study across 58 countries (N = 18,128), we demonstrate that violent extremist intentions manifest along two distinct psychological phenomena: defensive extremism, motivated by protecting one’s group from (perceived) threats, and offensive extremism, driven by establishing group dominance. We show that these dimensions a) can be reliably differentiated across diverse cultural contexts, b) are distinctively associated with psychological dispositions, and c) systematically differentiate countries varying in macrolevel sociopolitical functioning and violence. Across nations, a two-factorial structure was observed that was invariant at the scalar level. Defensive extremist intentions were consistently higher than offensive extremism in 56 out of 58 countries, suggesting greater moral acceptance of protective violence. While psychopathy was positively related to both types of violent extremist intentions, those high in Machiavellianism and narcissism demonstrated particularly higher levels of defensive extremist intentions. By contrast, those scoring high on religious fundamentalism and social dominance orientation demonstrated particularly higher levels of offensive extremist intentions. Unexpectedly, liberal political group identification was associated with higher offensive but lower defensive extremist intentions. Crucially, offensive (but not defensive) intentions were associated with macrolevel societal dysfunction, including political terror and internal conflict. These findings establish that defensive and offensive violent extremist intentions represent two conceptually different forms of extremism across a large and diverse range of countries, with consequences for research and practice.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2535665123
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume123
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • defensive
  • evolution
  • offensive
  • psychology
  • violent extremism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The psychology of offensive and defensive intergroup violence: Preregistered insights from 58 countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this