The United Nations and the Cyprus problem

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Both communities in the Cyprus dispute have at different times objected to the intervention of the United Nations when in their view mediatory function was somewhat replaced by more forceful methods resembling arbitration. In 1965, the UN Mediator, Galo Plaza, issued a Report that met outright opposition from Turkey and Turkish Cypriots on the grounds that the mediator had acted as an arbiter. In 2004, the Annan Plan was rejected by the Greek Cypriots feeling that the kind of settlement proposed was an imposition by the outsiders. This short paper aims to assess the intervening role of the UN in Cyprus in respect of peacemaking and peacekeeping from 1964 to the present day. Both the traditional nature of the UN peacekeeping force in Cyprus UNFICYP as well as the oscillating diplomatic efforts of the organisation to bring about a settlement have been discussed. The attitude of the belligerent parties to the UN involvement, their concerns and expectation as well as the influence of the major powers through the organisation to tailor a solution has accordingly been analysed.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)149-158
    Number of pages10
    JournalCyprus Review
    Volume22
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2010

    Keywords

    • Cyprus
    • Internal orientation
    • Mediation
    • Outside influence
    • Peacekeeping
    • Peacemaking
    • Turkey
    • United Nations

    Cite this

    @article{5ee577ed06004e8795301dec715a110e,
    title = "The United Nations and the Cyprus problem",
    abstract = "Both communities in the Cyprus dispute have at different times objected to the intervention of the United Nations when in their view mediatory function was somewhat replaced by more forceful methods resembling arbitration. In 1965, the UN Mediator, Galo Plaza, issued a Report that met outright opposition from Turkey and Turkish Cypriots on the grounds that the mediator had acted as an arbiter. In 2004, the Annan Plan was rejected by the Greek Cypriots feeling that the kind of settlement proposed was an imposition by the outsiders. This short paper aims to assess the intervening role of the UN in Cyprus in respect of peacemaking and peacekeeping from 1964 to the present day. Both the traditional nature of the UN peacekeeping force in Cyprus UNFICYP as well as the oscillating diplomatic efforts of the organisation to bring about a settlement have been discussed. The attitude of the belligerent parties to the UN involvement, their concerns and expectation as well as the influence of the major powers through the organisation to tailor a solution has accordingly been analysed.",
    keywords = "Cyprus, Internal orientation, Mediation, Outside influence, Peacekeeping, Peacemaking, Turkey, United Nations",
    author = "Farid Mirbagheri",
    year = "2010",
    month = "9",
    language = "English",
    volume = "22",
    pages = "149--158",
    journal = "Cyprus Review",
    issn = "1015-2881",
    publisher = "Intercollege",
    number = "2",

    }

    The United Nations and the Cyprus problem. / Mirbagheri, Farid.

    In: Cyprus Review, Vol. 22, No. 2, 09.2010, p. 149-158.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The United Nations and the Cyprus problem

    AU - Mirbagheri, Farid

    PY - 2010/9

    Y1 - 2010/9

    N2 - Both communities in the Cyprus dispute have at different times objected to the intervention of the United Nations when in their view mediatory function was somewhat replaced by more forceful methods resembling arbitration. In 1965, the UN Mediator, Galo Plaza, issued a Report that met outright opposition from Turkey and Turkish Cypriots on the grounds that the mediator had acted as an arbiter. In 2004, the Annan Plan was rejected by the Greek Cypriots feeling that the kind of settlement proposed was an imposition by the outsiders. This short paper aims to assess the intervening role of the UN in Cyprus in respect of peacemaking and peacekeeping from 1964 to the present day. Both the traditional nature of the UN peacekeeping force in Cyprus UNFICYP as well as the oscillating diplomatic efforts of the organisation to bring about a settlement have been discussed. The attitude of the belligerent parties to the UN involvement, their concerns and expectation as well as the influence of the major powers through the organisation to tailor a solution has accordingly been analysed.

    AB - Both communities in the Cyprus dispute have at different times objected to the intervention of the United Nations when in their view mediatory function was somewhat replaced by more forceful methods resembling arbitration. In 1965, the UN Mediator, Galo Plaza, issued a Report that met outright opposition from Turkey and Turkish Cypriots on the grounds that the mediator had acted as an arbiter. In 2004, the Annan Plan was rejected by the Greek Cypriots feeling that the kind of settlement proposed was an imposition by the outsiders. This short paper aims to assess the intervening role of the UN in Cyprus in respect of peacemaking and peacekeeping from 1964 to the present day. Both the traditional nature of the UN peacekeeping force in Cyprus UNFICYP as well as the oscillating diplomatic efforts of the organisation to bring about a settlement have been discussed. The attitude of the belligerent parties to the UN involvement, their concerns and expectation as well as the influence of the major powers through the organisation to tailor a solution has accordingly been analysed.

    KW - Cyprus

    KW - Internal orientation

    KW - Mediation

    KW - Outside influence

    KW - Peacekeeping

    KW - Peacemaking

    KW - Turkey

    KW - United Nations

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751490052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:78751490052

    VL - 22

    SP - 149

    EP - 158

    JO - Cyprus Review

    JF - Cyprus Review

    SN - 1015-2881

    IS - 2

    ER -