TY - JOUR
T1 - Translational Block in Stroke
T2 - A Constructive and “Out-of-the-Box” Reappraisal
AU - Lourbopoulos, Athanasios
AU - Mourouzis, Iordanis
AU - Xinaris, Christodoulos
AU - Zerva, Nefeli
AU - Filippakis, Konstantinos
AU - Pavlopoulos, Angelos
AU - Pantos, Constantinos
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2021 Lourbopoulos, Mourouzis, Xinaris, Zerva, Filippakis, Pavlopoulos and Pantos.
PY - 2021/5/14
Y1 - 2021/5/14
N2 - Why can we still not translate preclinical research to clinical treatments for acute strokes? Despite > 1000 successful preclinical studies, drugs, and concepts for acute stroke, only two have reached clinical translation. This is the translational block. Yet, we continue to routinely model strokes using almost the same concepts we have used for over 30 years. Methodological improvements and criteria from the last decade have shed some light but have not solved the problem. In this conceptual analysis, we review the current status and reappraise it by thinking “out-of-the-box” and over the edges. As such, we query why other scientific fields have also faced the same translational failures, to find common denominators. In parallel, we query how migraine, multiple sclerosis, and hypothermia in hypoxic encephalopathy have achieved significant translation successes. Should we view ischemic stroke as a “chronic, relapsing, vascular” disease, then secondary prevention strategies are also a successful translation. Finally, based on the lessons learned, we propose how stroke should be modeled, and how preclinical and clinical scientists, editors, grant reviewers, and industry should reconsider their routine way of conducting research. Translational success for stroke treatments may eventually require a bold change with solutions that are outside of the box.
AB - Why can we still not translate preclinical research to clinical treatments for acute strokes? Despite > 1000 successful preclinical studies, drugs, and concepts for acute stroke, only two have reached clinical translation. This is the translational block. Yet, we continue to routinely model strokes using almost the same concepts we have used for over 30 years. Methodological improvements and criteria from the last decade have shed some light but have not solved the problem. In this conceptual analysis, we review the current status and reappraise it by thinking “out-of-the-box” and over the edges. As such, we query why other scientific fields have also faced the same translational failures, to find common denominators. In parallel, we query how migraine, multiple sclerosis, and hypothermia in hypoxic encephalopathy have achieved significant translation successes. Should we view ischemic stroke as a “chronic, relapsing, vascular” disease, then secondary prevention strategies are also a successful translation. Finally, based on the lessons learned, we propose how stroke should be modeled, and how preclinical and clinical scientists, editors, grant reviewers, and industry should reconsider their routine way of conducting research. Translational success for stroke treatments may eventually require a bold change with solutions that are outside of the box.
KW - clinical
KW - experimental stroke models
KW - failure of translation
KW - interdisciplinary
KW - preclinical
KW - stroke
KW - translational block
KW - translational success
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85107077482
U2 - 10.3389/fnins.2021.652403
DO - 10.3389/fnins.2021.652403
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85107077482
SN - 1662-4548
VL - 15
JO - Frontiers in Neuroscience
JF - Frontiers in Neuroscience
M1 - 652403
ER -