Trusts, central registry and real beneficiary in cyprus: Historical, conceptual and legislative approach

Pavlos Kougioumtsidis, Petros Lois, Spyros Repousis

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)


    The present study shows the numerous and varied legislative provisions and initiatives in Cyprus to reduce illegal movement of funds and money laundering through trusts. It is, therefore, crucial to analyse certain aspects of this legal arrangement, which mainly relate to the issue of transparency, in order to understand the entire chain structure behind the crime of money laundering through trusts and ultimate beneficial owner (UBO). Money laundering is inextricably linked with anonymity. The status of the trust is both related to and distinct from the issue of information exchange between countries regarding the battle against money laundering, as Cyprus, in recent years, tends to be pressed particularly to disclose bank secrecy data. Under the provisions voted since 2012 and afterwards, the Cyprus Parliament passed a supplementary to the Fiduciaries Law, which was the Central Registry of Trust. Cyprus must ensure that beneficial ownership information is stored in a central register located outside the company. Also, the greater transparency over the identity of the UBO, through the establishment of public registers, would act as a deterrent to misconduct. Evidence presented in this paper is important for national and super-national supervisory anti-money laundering bodies and compliance authorities to understand banking practices in Cyprus.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)141-153
    Number of pages13
    JournalCyprus Review
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2018


    • Banking practices
    • Cyprus
    • Money laundering
    • Transparency
    • Trusts


    Dive into the research topics of 'Trusts, central registry and real beneficiary in cyprus: Historical, conceptual and legislative approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this