TY - JOUR
T1 - UX evaluation of open MOOC platforms
T2 - a comparative study between Moodle and Open edX combining user interaction metrics and wearable biosensors
AU - Liapis, Alexandros
AU - Maratou, Vicky
AU - Panagiotakopoulos, Theodor
AU - Katsanos, Christos
AU - Kameas, Achilles
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The current era of (e-)learning invests heavily on Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Various dedicated MOOC platforms are used, such as Coursera, Udacity, and Open edX. Moodle, one of the most popular open-source Learning Management Systems (LMS), has been also used for MOOC implementations. Usability and user experience (UX) are very important for e-learning software. This paper presents an in-depth comparative UX evaluation of two platforms used for MOOC implementations: Open edX and Moodle. The reported evaluation study combines user interaction metrics and wearable biosensors. Participants performed four typical interaction tasks in both platforms. User performance data (task success, time on task), self-reported data (SUS, AttrakDiff), and stress-related physiological data (skin conductance, heart rate) were collected and analyzed. It was found that Open edX performs better than Moodle in almost every UX aspect we examined. However, the reported results do not imply that building and delivering a MOOC via Moodle is prohibitive. The choice of the platform to be used by an institution is affected by several factors of non-technological nature, such as students’ familiarity with an e-learning platform, available financial and human resources, as well as delivery deadlines.
AB - The current era of (e-)learning invests heavily on Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Various dedicated MOOC platforms are used, such as Coursera, Udacity, and Open edX. Moodle, one of the most popular open-source Learning Management Systems (LMS), has been also used for MOOC implementations. Usability and user experience (UX) are very important for e-learning software. This paper presents an in-depth comparative UX evaluation of two platforms used for MOOC implementations: Open edX and Moodle. The reported evaluation study combines user interaction metrics and wearable biosensors. Participants performed four typical interaction tasks in both platforms. User performance data (task success, time on task), self-reported data (SUS, AttrakDiff), and stress-related physiological data (skin conductance, heart rate) were collected and analyzed. It was found that Open edX performs better than Moodle in almost every UX aspect we examined. However, the reported results do not imply that building and delivering a MOOC via Moodle is prohibitive. The choice of the platform to be used by an institution is affected by several factors of non-technological nature, such as students’ familiarity with an e-learning platform, available financial and human resources, as well as delivery deadlines.
KW - MOOC platforms
KW - Moodle
KW - Open edX
KW - usability
KW - user experience
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126345548&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10494820.2022.2048674
DO - 10.1080/10494820.2022.2048674
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85126345548
SN - 1049-4820
JO - Interactive Learning Environments
JF - Interactive Learning Environments
ER -