VALUE OF DECISION MAKING IN A COMPLEX ENVIRONMENT: AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH.

Robin M. Hogarth, Spyros Makridakis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

77 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Are the costs of time and effort spent on analyzing decisions outweighed by benefits? This issue was examined in the context of a competitive business game where human teams were pitted against two kinds of simple-minded arbitrary decision rules: one where rules were applied consistently ( ″arbitrary-consistent″ ); the other where rules were subject to a random component ( ″arbitrary-random″ ). The arbitrary-consistent rules outperformed, on average, 41% of human opponents, the corresponding figure for arbitrary-random being 19%. These results are discussed within the more general context of consistency in decision making which has received considerable attention in both the management and psychological literatures, albeit in the more restricted case of non-competitive and stable environments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)93-107
Number of pages15
JournalManagement Science
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1981

Fingerprint

Decision making
Psychological
Decision rules
Costs
Business game

Cite this

@article{4bab44a050f64b8883171f0de9b7767d,
title = "VALUE OF DECISION MAKING IN A COMPLEX ENVIRONMENT: AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH.",
abstract = "Are the costs of time and effort spent on analyzing decisions outweighed by benefits? This issue was examined in the context of a competitive business game where human teams were pitted against two kinds of simple-minded arbitrary decision rules: one where rules were applied consistently ( ″arbitrary-consistent″ ); the other where rules were subject to a random component ( ″arbitrary-random″ ). The arbitrary-consistent rules outperformed, on average, 41{\%} of human opponents, the corresponding figure for arbitrary-random being 19{\%}. These results are discussed within the more general context of consistency in decision making which has received considerable attention in both the management and psychological literatures, albeit in the more restricted case of non-competitive and stable environments.",
author = "Hogarth, {Robin M.} and Spyros Makridakis",
year = "1981",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1287/mnsc.27.1.93",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "93--107",
journal = "Management Science",
issn = "0025-1909",
publisher = "INFORMS Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences",
number = "1",

}

VALUE OF DECISION MAKING IN A COMPLEX ENVIRONMENT : AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH. / Hogarth, Robin M.; Makridakis, Spyros.

In: Management Science, Vol. 27, No. 1, 01.01.1981, p. 93-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - VALUE OF DECISION MAKING IN A COMPLEX ENVIRONMENT

T2 - AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH.

AU - Hogarth, Robin M.

AU - Makridakis, Spyros

PY - 1981/1/1

Y1 - 1981/1/1

N2 - Are the costs of time and effort spent on analyzing decisions outweighed by benefits? This issue was examined in the context of a competitive business game where human teams were pitted against two kinds of simple-minded arbitrary decision rules: one where rules were applied consistently ( ″arbitrary-consistent″ ); the other where rules were subject to a random component ( ″arbitrary-random″ ). The arbitrary-consistent rules outperformed, on average, 41% of human opponents, the corresponding figure for arbitrary-random being 19%. These results are discussed within the more general context of consistency in decision making which has received considerable attention in both the management and psychological literatures, albeit in the more restricted case of non-competitive and stable environments.

AB - Are the costs of time and effort spent on analyzing decisions outweighed by benefits? This issue was examined in the context of a competitive business game where human teams were pitted against two kinds of simple-minded arbitrary decision rules: one where rules were applied consistently ( ″arbitrary-consistent″ ); the other where rules were subject to a random component ( ″arbitrary-random″ ). The arbitrary-consistent rules outperformed, on average, 41% of human opponents, the corresponding figure for arbitrary-random being 19%. These results are discussed within the more general context of consistency in decision making which has received considerable attention in both the management and psychological literatures, albeit in the more restricted case of non-competitive and stable environments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019396775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1287/mnsc.27.1.93

DO - 10.1287/mnsc.27.1.93

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0019396775

VL - 27

SP - 93

EP - 107

JO - Management Science

JF - Management Science

SN - 0025-1909

IS - 1

ER -