Abstract
• Medical science stands accused of providing an incomplete understanding of health because it is supposedly founded on linearity, reductionism, and positivism. • These criticisms misrepresent the scientific method. • The alternatives offered by complexity theory, postmodernism, and qualitative research risk falling into the traps that the scientific method avoids. • The hypotheticodeductive model of science provides both a coherent description of the growth of scientific knowledge and a prescription for the conduct of good science.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 400-401 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | British Journal of General Practice |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 502 |
| Publication status | Published - May 2004 |